Mples with the highest anti-Tat OD values from 100 HIV-seropositive and anti-58-49-1 chemical information Tat-seronegative samples and further assessed their reactivities with the N and C antigens, and we uncovered yet another response profile. Profile 6) Tat-related 
response: Six of the 100 Tat-seronegative samples fell into this category, which was characterized by reactivity against C antigensDiscussionIn this study, we define for the first time host’s anti-Tat responses in Chinese patients infected with HIV-1. Consistent with the previous findings that Tat is intrinsically nonimmunodominant in nature [13,14,15,16,17], our results also verified this conclusion (Fig. 2). This nonimmunodominant property is consistent with the results of structural studies which revealed that HIV Tat is an intrinsically unstructured protein, or unfolded protein lack of secondary structures and high structures [28,29,30,31], and which could be likely to help avoid elicting the host’s anti-Tat immunity. In this study, the N antigens and C antigens clearly showed obviously different antigenicity (Fig. 2b, 3). Moreover, there were still some differences in antigenicity between different N antigens or different C antigens (Fig. 2b, 3). Based on these differences, we characterized six immunological profiles: full potential response, combined response, N-specific response, C-specific response, fulllength Tat-specific response and Tat-related response. Interestingly, samples from the full-potential response and N-preferred 25837696 reaction type in the combined response profile presented strong or moderate reactions to the N, C and full-length Tat antigens and also showed the highest neutralizing activity (Fig. 3, 4). These sample types only accounted for 23.8 of total Tat-seropositive samples, and they represent the strongest reactive groups. In contrast, all other samples (except for the samples of full C reaction type in C specific response profile) almostly present weak reactions to N, C and full-length Tat antigens, and showed weakTat Antibody Responses to HIV-1 Infectionneutralizing activity (Fig. 3, 4). Based on these findings and the fact that Tat is intrinsically nonimmunodominant, we hypothesize that the full-potential response profile and N-preferred reaction in combined response profile represent the major complete anti-Tat antibody response, which was elicited recently by a large amount of transiently 
released Tat produced on the occasion of vigorous replication of the newly immuno-escaped HIV strains, and target all, or at least multiple, N and C epitopes of Tat. It is possible that the other response profiles (except for the full C reaction type and part of the common reaction type in C-specific response profile) could represent various Eledoisin site degraded forms of this complete antibody response. Follow up of these Tat-seropositive individuals will help to verify this hypothesis. It was also interesting to find that the samples from the full C reaction in C-specific response profile showed moderate reactivity to all four C antigens but weak reactivity to full-length Tat (Fig. 3), as well as showed significant neutralizing activity (Fig. 4). This result could suggest that there were few individuals (,9.5 ) who elicited an alternative antibody response that is more specific to C antigens (C-prone response) other than the major complete antiTat antibody response. Some samples of the common reaction type in C-specific response profile might represent the degraded form of this C-prone response. Th.Mples with the highest anti-Tat OD values from 100 HIV-seropositive and anti-Tat-seronegative samples and further assessed their reactivities with the N and C antigens, and we uncovered yet another response profile. Profile 6) Tat-related response: Six of the 100 Tat-seronegative samples fell into this category, which was characterized by reactivity against C antigensDiscussionIn this study, we define for the first time host’s anti-Tat responses in Chinese patients infected with HIV-1. Consistent with the previous findings that Tat is intrinsically nonimmunodominant in nature [13,14,15,16,17], our results also verified this conclusion (Fig. 2). This nonimmunodominant property is consistent with the results of structural studies which revealed that HIV Tat is an intrinsically unstructured protein, or unfolded protein lack of secondary structures and high structures [28,29,30,31], and which could be likely to help avoid elicting the host’s anti-Tat immunity. In this study, the N antigens and C antigens clearly showed obviously different antigenicity (Fig. 2b, 3). Moreover, there were still some differences in antigenicity between different N antigens or different C antigens (Fig. 2b, 3). Based on these differences, we characterized six immunological profiles: full potential response, combined response, N-specific response, C-specific response, fulllength Tat-specific response and Tat-related response. Interestingly, samples from the full-potential response and N-preferred 25837696 reaction type in the combined response profile presented strong or moderate reactions to the N, C and full-length Tat antigens and also showed the highest neutralizing activity (Fig. 3, 4). These sample types only accounted for 23.8 of total Tat-seropositive samples, and they represent the strongest reactive groups. In contrast, all other samples (except for the samples of full C reaction type in C specific response profile) almostly present weak reactions to N, C and full-length Tat antigens, and showed weakTat Antibody Responses to HIV-1 Infectionneutralizing activity (Fig. 3, 4). Based on these findings and the fact that Tat is intrinsically nonimmunodominant, we hypothesize that the full-potential response profile and N-preferred reaction in combined response profile represent the major complete anti-Tat antibody response, which was elicited recently by a large amount of transiently released Tat produced on the occasion of vigorous replication of the newly immuno-escaped HIV strains, and target all, or at least multiple, N and C epitopes of Tat. It is possible that the other response profiles (except for the full C reaction type and part of the common reaction type in C-specific response profile) could represent various degraded forms of this complete antibody response. Follow up of these Tat-seropositive individuals will help to verify this hypothesis. It was also interesting to find that the samples from the full C reaction in C-specific response profile showed moderate reactivity to all four C antigens but weak reactivity to full-length Tat (Fig. 3), as well as showed significant neutralizing activity (Fig. 4). This result could suggest that there were few individuals (,9.5 ) who elicited an alternative antibody response that is more specific to C antigens (C-prone response) other than the major complete antiTat antibody response. Some samples of the common reaction type in C-specific response profile might represent the degraded form of this C-prone response. Th.
