Carcinoma Mucoepidermoid carcinoma Papillary carcinoma Papillary carcinomaUsed Antibody 8G7 1G8 1G8 1G8 Rabbit polyclonal (Gut 2000 47:349) 1G8 1GCorrelation of MUC4 expression with outcome Poor Better Better No correlation Better No expression of MUC4/1G8 Correlation with small tumor size and microcarcinoma subtype, No comment for outcome Poor Better Better No correlation No association with tumor type, stage or with the degree of differetiation, No comment for outcome Poor Poor Poor 1655472 Poor Poor No correlationReference Hamada (2012) Weed (2004) Weed (2004) Handra-Luca (2005) Alos (2005) Baek (2007) Nam (2011)Ref. No [9] [28] [27] [20] [19] [25] [23]Lung Lung Lung Breast StomachSmall sized adenocarcinoma Non mall cell lung carcinoma Non mall cell lung carcinoma(NSCLC) Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma8G7 1G8 (Zymed) 1G8 1G8 8GTsutsumida (2007) Kwon (2007) Jeon (2010) Rakha (2005) Senapati (2008)[13] [29] [30] [21] [18]Bile duct Bile duct Pancreas Pancreas Colon Ovary ProstateIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma-mass forming type Extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma Invasive ductal carcinoma Pancreatobiliary adenocarcinomas Colorectal adenocarcinoma Serous, mucinous, Nobiletin endometrioid and clear cell carcinoma Prostate cancer8G7 8G7 8G7 1G8 8G7 8G7 8GShibahara (2004) Tamada (2006) Saitou (2005) Westgaard (2009) Shanmugam (2010) Chauhan (2006)[10] [11] [12] [31] [26] [22] [24]Down regulation in prostate Singh (2006) cancer tissues, No comment for outcomedoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049251.tMUC4/8G7 was expressed mainly in the cytoplasm of the PD168393 site neoplastic cells of pap (Fig. 2B), tub1 (Fig. 2F) and tub2 (Fig. 2J), in the cases with positive expression. Expression profile of MUC4/1G8. Among the 197 adenocarcinoma lesions, MUC4/1G8 was expressed in 95 lesions (48 ). MUC4/1G8 showed significantly higher rates of the positive expression in well differentiated types (pap+tub1: 67 , 36/54) than that in poorly differentiated types (por1+por2: 36 , 20/55) (P = 0.0021) (Fig. 3B, arrows). MUC4/1G8 was expressed mainly at the cell apexes of pap (Fig. 2C), tub1 (Figs. 2G) and tub2 (Fig. 2K), or in the intracytoplasmic mucin substance of sig (Fig. 2a), in the cases with positive expression. Expression profile of MUC1/DF3. Among the 197 adenocarcinoma lesions, MUC1/DF3 was expressed in 62 lesions (31 ). MUC1/DF3 showed significantly higher rates of the positive expression in well differentiated types (pap+tub1: 52 , 28/54) than that in poorly differentiated types (por1+por2: 13 , 7/55) (P,0.0001) (Fig. 3C, arrows). MUC1/DF3 was expressed mainly at the cell 1317923 apexes of pap, tub1 and tub2 (Fig. 2L), in the cases with positive expression.Comparison of mucin expression in each histologic type. In tub1, expression rates of MUC4/8G7 and MUC4/expression rate of MUC4/1G8 was significantly higher than that of MUC4/8G7 (P = 0.0286) or that of MUC1/DF3 (P = 0.0005) (Fig. 3, *2). In sig, expression rate of MUC4/1G8 was significantly higher than that of MUC4/8G7 (P = 0.0158) or that of MUC1/ DF3 (sig, P = 0.0019) (Fig. 3, *3). In the other histolgical types (pap, tub2, muc and por1), there was no significant difference in the expression rates among MUC4/8G7, MUC4/1G8 and MUC1/DF3 (Fig. 3).Relationship between MUC4 or MUC1 expression and lymph vessel invasion, blood vessel invasion and lymph node metastasis. Semiquantitative evaluation of lymphatic1G8 were significantly higher than that of MUC1/DF3 (P = 0.0106 and P = 0.039, respectively) (Fig. 3, *1). In por2, theinvasion (ly), venous invasion.Carcinoma Mucoepidermoid carcinoma Papillary carcinoma Papillary carcinomaUsed Antibody 8G7 1G8 1G8 1G8 Rabbit polyclonal (Gut 2000 47:349) 1G8 1GCorrelation of MUC4 expression with outcome Poor Better Better No correlation Better No expression of MUC4/1G8 Correlation with small tumor size and microcarcinoma subtype, No comment for outcome Poor Better Better No correlation No association with tumor type, stage or with the degree of differetiation, No comment for outcome Poor Poor Poor 1655472 Poor Poor No correlationReference Hamada (2012) Weed (2004) Weed (2004) Handra-Luca (2005) Alos (2005) Baek (2007) Nam (2011)Ref. No [9] [28] [27] [20] [19] [25] [23]Lung Lung Lung Breast StomachSmall sized adenocarcinoma Non mall cell lung carcinoma Non mall cell lung carcinoma(NSCLC) Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma8G7 1G8 (Zymed) 1G8 1G8 8GTsutsumida (2007) Kwon (2007) Jeon (2010) Rakha (2005) Senapati (2008)[13] [29] [30] [21] [18]Bile duct Bile duct Pancreas Pancreas Colon Ovary ProstateIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma-mass forming type Extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma Invasive ductal carcinoma Pancreatobiliary adenocarcinomas Colorectal adenocarcinoma Serous, mucinous, endometrioid and clear cell carcinoma Prostate cancer8G7 8G7 8G7 1G8 8G7 8G7 8GShibahara (2004) Tamada (2006) Saitou (2005) Westgaard (2009) Shanmugam (2010) Chauhan (2006)[10] [11] [12] [31] [26] [22] [24]Down regulation in prostate Singh (2006) cancer tissues, No comment for outcomedoi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049251.tMUC4/8G7 was expressed mainly in the cytoplasm of the neoplastic cells of pap (Fig. 2B), tub1 (Fig. 2F) and tub2 (Fig. 2J), in the cases with positive expression. Expression profile of MUC4/1G8. Among the 197 adenocarcinoma lesions, MUC4/1G8 was expressed in 95 lesions (48 ). MUC4/1G8 showed significantly higher rates of the positive expression in well differentiated types (pap+tub1: 67 , 36/54) than that in poorly differentiated types (por1+por2: 36 , 20/55) (P = 0.0021) (Fig. 3B, arrows). MUC4/1G8 was expressed mainly at the cell apexes of pap (Fig. 2C), tub1 (Figs. 2G) and tub2 (Fig. 2K), or in the intracytoplasmic mucin substance of sig (Fig. 2a), in the cases with positive expression. Expression profile of MUC1/DF3. Among the 197 adenocarcinoma lesions, MUC1/DF3 was expressed in 62 lesions (31 ). MUC1/DF3 showed significantly higher rates of the positive expression in well differentiated types (pap+tub1: 52 , 28/54) than that in poorly differentiated types (por1+por2: 13 , 7/55) (P,0.0001) (Fig. 3C, arrows). MUC1/DF3 was expressed mainly at the cell 1317923 apexes of pap, tub1 and tub2 (Fig. 2L), in the cases with positive expression.Comparison of mucin expression in each histologic type. In tub1, expression rates of MUC4/8G7 and MUC4/expression rate of MUC4/1G8 was significantly higher than that of MUC4/8G7 (P = 0.0286) or that of MUC1/DF3 (P = 0.0005) (Fig. 3, *2). In sig, expression rate of MUC4/1G8 was significantly higher than that of MUC4/8G7 (P = 0.0158) or that of MUC1/ DF3 (sig, P = 0.0019) (Fig. 3, *3). In the other histolgical types (pap, tub2, muc and por1), there was no significant difference in the expression rates among MUC4/8G7, MUC4/1G8 and MUC1/DF3 (Fig. 3).Relationship between MUC4 or MUC1 expression and lymph vessel invasion, blood vessel invasion and lymph node metastasis. Semiquantitative evaluation of lymphatic1G8 were significantly higher than that of MUC1/DF3 (P = 0.0106 and P = 0.039, respectively) (Fig. 3, *1). In por2, theinvasion (ly), venous invasion.
