……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..Islam0.0.0.0.0……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………weddings0.0.0.0.0.rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org R. Soc. open sci. 3:…………………………………………10rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org R. Soc. open sci. 3:…………………………………………no. users active in 28-day spring periodIndian politicsScottish politics nursingastronomy wildlife and animalsdogshousing sector weddings`Gamergate’ religionfriends chattinghuman resources Islam versus atheism Islam nursing Madeleine McCann smoking/e-cigarettesfriends chatting1 1 10 100 1000 no. users active in 28-day NS-018 biological activity autumn period weighted Louvain k-clique-communities 10LouvainFigure 7. The communities we studied endured strongly over a 19-week period.measures (MC) and (SS) (MC) and (L) (SS) and (L)correlation coefficient (autumn) 0.971 0.correlation coefficient (spring) 0.954 0……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….0.0.Thus at the community level, the three measures are very similar.4.3. Dynamics of 3′-Methylquercetin custom synthesis sentiments in communitiesHere, we analyse the changes in sentiment/mood of our communities over time (or the lack thereof, as it generally turns out). Figure 10 plots the mean (SS) sentiment of each community over the autumn period against the mean (SS) sentiment over the spring period. We see that the sentiments persisted very strongly: the correlation between the autumn sentiment and spring sentiment is 0.982. The corresponding correlation under the (MC) measure was 0.982, and under (L) was 0.960. We looked for explanations for the (small) changes in sentiments that did occur. On the vertical axis of figure 11, we show the change in mean sentiment between the autumn period and spring period using (MC); a positive number means that the sentiment became more positive over time. On the horizontal axis, we show the mean sentiment during the autumn period. What we find is that when the sentiment is initially at the negative end of the spectrum, it tends to increase slightly; on the other hand, if the sentiment is initially at the positive end, it tends to decrease slightly. In fact, the sentiment in 16 of the 18 communities moved slightly towards a moderate (MC) value of 0.4 (which is approximately where the line of best fit cuts the horizontal axis in figure 11). This could be because extreme sentiment in a community is `whipped up’ by external events and then, once those ev………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………Islam0.0.0.0.0……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………weddings0.0.0.0.0.rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org R. Soc. open sci. 3:…………………………………………10rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org R. Soc. open sci. 3:…………………………………………no. users active in 28-day spring periodIndian politicsScottish politics nursingastronomy wildlife and animalsdogshousing sector weddings`Gamergate’ religionfriends chattinghuman resources Islam versus atheism Islam nursing Madeleine McCann smoking/e-cigarettesfriends chatting1 1 10 100 1000 no. users active in 28-day autumn period weighted Louvain k-clique-communities 10LouvainFigure 7. The communities we studied endured strongly over a 19-week period.measures (MC) and (SS) (MC) and (L) (SS) and (L)correlation coefficient (autumn) 0.971 0.correlation coefficient (spring) 0.954 0……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….0.0.Thus at the community level, the three measures are very similar.4.3. Dynamics of sentiments in communitiesHere, we analyse the changes in sentiment/mood of our communities over time (or the lack thereof, as it generally turns out). Figure 10 plots the mean (SS) sentiment of each community over the autumn period against the mean (SS) sentiment over the spring period. We see that the sentiments persisted very strongly: the correlation between the autumn sentiment and spring sentiment is 0.982. The corresponding correlation under the (MC) measure was 0.982, and under (L) was 0.960. We looked for explanations for the (small) changes in sentiments that did occur. On the vertical axis of figure 11, we show the change in mean sentiment between the autumn period and spring period using (MC); a positive number means that the sentiment became more positive over time. On the horizontal axis, we show the mean sentiment during the autumn period. What we find is that when the sentiment is initially at the negative end of the spectrum, it tends to increase slightly; on the other hand, if the sentiment is initially at the positive end, it tends to decrease slightly. In fact, the sentiment in 16 of the 18 communities moved slightly towards a moderate (MC) value of 0.4 (which is approximately where the line of best fit cuts the horizontal axis in figure 11). This could be because extreme sentiment in a community is `whipped up’ by external events and then, once those ev.