Share this post on:

Urnal.pone.09036 March 20,two Putting Your Income Where Your Mouth Is: Beyond
Urnal.pone.09036 March 20,two Putting Your Dollars Exactly where Your Mouth Is: Beyond 3BL CSR ReportingTable 2. (Continued) CODE Minimize waste Decrease water use Reducereuserecycle Lower emissions Sponsor events Stimulate accountable customer PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24367588 behavior Assistance human rights Help smallscale enterprise Transition to clean refrigeration Transition to renewable energy Use land responsibly doi:0.37journal.pone.09036.t002 DESCRIPTION Modify MedChemExpress RIP2 kinase inhibitor 1 production processes to produce much less waste Alter production processes to demand significantly less water Adjust production processes to lessen input, reuse parts that would otherwise turn into waste, and recycle recyclable materials Decrease emissions by way of renewable power transitions, carbon capture and storage, power efficiency, or other measures. Host or contribute to events that market behaviors or activities inside the triple bottom line framework Influence buyers to use the solution within a certain way (for instance, taking shorter showers when working with their shampoo) Contribute to activities that support human rights including campaigns to limit perform hours or NGO efforts to improve perform environment Contribute to or buy from smallscale enterprises Switch to working with environmentally friendly refrigerants or reduced power refrigeration systems Switch, to some extent, from fossil fuel power to renewable power Buy from farmers who look at the impacts from the way they use their land. Triple Bottom LineWe use a Venn diagram to show regardless of whether every code falls into 1 or far more with the three categories eople, Planet, and Profit (see Fig. ). We thereby adhere to the method by Lozano and Huisingh [38]. A Venn diagram can be a visual help that allows us to determine how specific concepts; within this case, codes; fall into 1 or much more of as much as 3 different categories. Such a image of the categorical distribution makes it possible for us to find out trends and clusters that could otherwise be challenging to detect. Within this depiction, we’ve selected to involve the nine general codes (Fig. , in bold). They have been left in since even though they’re not necessarily linked to a particular behavior, they do represent a CSR subject or notion that the firm identifies as beneficial. From this diagram, we are able to see that the “People” circle includes probably the most codes (34), showing us that that is the topic most elaborated upon inside the sustainability reports and interviews. “Profit” would be the next most elaborated upon (30), and “Planet” the least (25). This implies that within the interviews and CSR reports, there are additional behaviors or CSR topics pointed out that influence individuals, as when compared with the other categories. This calls into question the topic of stakeholder management. Is “People” most elaborated upon simply because it’s actually the main concentrate in the firms Or do peoplefocused topics get far more consideration in sustainability reports simply due to the fact they are essentially the most relevant for stakeholders to study about It is actually crucial to note that although more peoplerelated topics are pointed out, this will not necessarily imply that more cash or effort is put into peoplerelated CSR practices. To further investigate this, we will have to appear at the information by way of our two more lenses.2. Alter in Core Firm BehaviorTo get a far better idea of exactly where the work with the firms is going, we separate the codes primarily based on the kind of adjust that certain CSR practices need hat is, no matter whether or not a firm has to alter their core production practices, or motivate other people in the supply chain to perform so. The outcomes are shown in Fig. 2. Due to the fact we’re judging.

Share this post on:

Author: email exporter