Icular around the of the Museo Egizio, was identified [2]. In to
Icular around the with the Museo Egizio, was found [2]. In to this, the only documente from the dust and also the consolidation of the preparation and paint had been PF-06873600 Protocol carried out, together with the on a securing remedy carried on the artefact by Luigi Vigna, at that time directo aim of allowing a correct reading plus a safe handling of the object. Further upkeep conservation laboratory of to place chronologically have been [2]. In this context, the r interventions, that are tough the Museo Egizio, was foundindeed carried out: as an example a modern day nail inserted to reinforce the assembly of theand was clearly detected out, w from the dust plus the consolidation from the preparation arm paint have been carried by X-rayallowing a correct reading plus a safe handling from the object. Further principal aim of Compound 48/80 Formula radiography (not shown here). Thinking of the complex layering of components, it was essential to recognize if interventions, that are difficult to location chronologically have already been certainly carr the cleaning operations had to become limited to the surface dirt, or when the removal of a single orfor instance a modern nail inserted to reinforce the assembly with the arm was detected by X-ray radiography (not shown right here). Thinking of the complicated layering of supplies, it was essential to understan cleaning operations had to become restricted towards the surface dirt, or if the removal of oneCoatings 2021, 11,4 ofCoatings 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW4 ofmore paint layers might be thought of, if these were demonstrated to be non-original. In certain, the characterization on the brown prime layer seemed required: even though not visible near to the gaps, and thus, apparently not applied right after some deterioration, without having without the need of a lot more details it its not doable to not doable to exclude in advance far more information on its nature,onwas nature, it was exclude in advance its pertinence to a its pe non-originalapatina. In addition, it can be worth noting that the superficial dirtthe superficial dirt wa tinence to non-original patina. Moreover, it truly is worth noting that was placed on major of a rough, porousrough, porousfragileextremely fragile surface, which could have mad placed on prime of a and extremely and surface, which could have produced the cleaning operation specifically challenging (Figure three). the cleaning operation especially difficult (Figure 3).Figure Detail of of back of your the study. It may be observed that distinctive paint layers are covered Figure three. 3. Detail thethe back of case case study. It could be observed that distinctive paint layers are covere with dust. with dust.Archaeological painting components as the the Egyptian ones, typically strongly waterArchaeological painting supplies as Egyptian ones, are are normally strongly water-sen sensitive, andcannot be cleaned with traditional gels gels for example agarose-based ones. Howeve sitive, and can’t be cleaned with traditional like agarose-based ones. However, in consideration with the lack of superficial cohesion on the supplies, any mechanical action, in consideration on the lack of superficial cohesion on the supplies, any mechanical action as that connected with dry cleaning approaches, could possibly happen to be as well stressful for the surface. as that linked with dry cleaning approaches, may possibly happen to be also stressful for the su For that reason, it was decided to compare traditional dry-cleaning procedures, extensively tested and face. Hence, it was decided to examine standard dry-cleaning procedures, usually utilised on archaeological polychromies [7], with revolutionary extremely ret.
