T: Not applicable. Conflicts of Interest: Jose A Perez Simon participated
T: Not applicable. Conflicts of Interest: Jose A Perez Simon participated in advisory boards and/or educational sessions and/or research projects from Novartis, BMS/Celgene, Kyte, JANSSEN. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
heritageArticleAnalysis and Identification of Sustainable Public Policy for Olesoxime manufacturer management of Fmoc-Gly-Gly-OH ADC Linkers Cultural and Organic Heritage within the Maya Area in Line using the Sustainable Development GoalsKennedy Obombo Magio 1, , Lilia Lucia Lizama Aranda 2 , Laureano Gonz ez three and Christian AlpucheCONACYT-Tecnol ico Nacional de M ico/Instituto Tecnol ico de Canc , Division of Investigation and Postgraduate Srtudies, Canc 77515, Mexico Archaeologists without having Borders in the Maya Globe, Puerto Morelos 77580, Mexico; [email protected] Alianza PADDEC A.C, Canc 77508, Mexico; [email protected] (L.G.); [email protected] (C.A.) Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: 5-24-Citation: Magio, K.O.; Lizama Aranda, L.L.; Gonz ez, L.; Alpuche, C. Evaluation and Identification of Sustainable Public Policy for Management of Cultural and All-natural Heritage in the Maya Area in Line together with the Sustainable Development Targets. Heritage 2021, four, 4172183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ heritage4040229 Academic Editor: Arlen F. Chase Received: 1 September 2021 Accepted: 27 October 2021 Published: 2 NovemberAbstract: The present study identifies appropriate sustainable public policy for the administration of archaeological zones in Mexico, particularly in the states of Yucat , Campeche and Quintana Roo (Maya region). Given the speedy financial development in the Southeastern area of Mexico, it can be necessary to implement a comprehensive and sustainable form of administration for the cultural and archaeological heritage. Essential components with the best policy are aligned to the Sustainable Improvement Ambitions (SDGs). Data is determined by researchers’ own experiences on how these SDGs can act as a base for the a lot required transform in the management of Mexico s archaeological zones. We’re seeking at a policy that has clear targets, objectives, concrete techniques and actions including: (1) Extensive plan, (two) Regional program, (3) Land use plan–master program, (4) Cultural tourism plan which covers ecotourism and nature based tourism, art centers, museums and monuments. The resource management plan really should cover aspects like: (1) disaster organizing, (2) operations and marketing and advertising, (three) interpretation, (four) budgetary problems and (five) financing. Good results within the implementation of such a policy requires the strengthening of regional and regional federalism, transparency, accountability, corporate governance and organizing for sustainable cultural tourism improvement. Keywords: sustainable public policy; Sustainable Improvement Targets; extensive administration; Maya area; cultural heritage; archaeological heritage1. Introduction The United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Objectives (SDGs: 2015030) would be the successors towards the UN Millennium Development Ambitions (MDGs: 2000015). While the MDGs were largely focused on hunger, poverty and illness, the SDGs added a stronger ecological focus and emphasize that all countries have function to complete to reach the objectives in their territory. Within this regard, cultural heritage management is an vital element from the SDGs. The UN Agenda 2030 recognizes culture heritage clearly in Target 11.4 to “protect and safeguard the world’s cultural and organic heritage” to be able to “make cities and human settlements inclusive, sa.
